Should i watch avengers in 3d or regular

Your waiting and patience have paid off, everyone! Avengers: Infinity War is finally in our universe, ready to destroy our hearts and wallets with a fury never before seen in the Marvel Cinematic Universe!

And, of course, with a vengeful being such as Thanos throwing planets and collecting Infinity Stones left and right, there's a potential for some massive 3D excitement. Which leads us to our favorite question to ask when a film this big pops up: to 3D, or not to 3D? If you're wondering how Avengers: Infinity War stacks up as an actual film, you'll want to head on over to our official review. But if you want to know if your 3D tickets price is justified, or if you'd be better off saving those extra bucks towards the purchase of your own Infinity Gauntlet, then you're in the right place.

Get ready to slip on your glasses, as we head into the third dimension and see if Avengers: Infinity War is worth the 3D hype. To think that Avengers: Infinity War isn't the sort of film that could benefit from the right 3D conversion is, quite frankly, tantamount to treason.

Not only is it the culmination of Marvel Studio's efforts to build a cinematic universe, it's also another step on the road to their ever improving standing in the realm of 3D thrills.

With Thanos wrecking things left and right, and a variety of Avengers whose powers are massively impressive in the third dimension , this is a perfect fit for conversion and distribution in 3D.

In terms of the planning and effort that went into Avengers: Infinity War , there's a pretty good level of attention that was paid to this film's 3D presentation. And yet, there's pieces of this conversion that really stand out as sore spots, in particular the audience health and brightness factors.

Despite those significant drawbacks, the film still has some fantastic visual flair, but it could have been so much better with a little more polish. There are moments of Avengers: Infinity War's 3D presentation that actually made me flinch. In particular, some of the creatures deployed during the gigantic Wakanda fight sequence really popped out of the screen.

So, if you haven't already, throw on some comfy clothes, grab some popcorn and make sure you have your 3D glasses handy as we figure out together whether or not it's worth shelling out some extra moolah for a 3D ticket.

Avengers: Endgame is exactly the type of movie you'd expect to get a 3D conversion. It's an action movie with lots of eye-popping digital effects and it had a giant budget to play with, so there are no concerns about skimping on the 3D here.

If you are a fan of 3D, this is likely exactly the type of movie you would see in 3D, other than something specifically shot for 3D, like Avatar or the upcoming Gemini Man.

Barring those, this is a high tier candidate for seeing a movie in 3D. That said, while the 3D conversion is pretty admirable, there are scenes in this movie that don't really beg for 3D effects, so I'm dropping this to a still a strong score.

In terms of planning and effort, obviously, as noted prior, Avengers: Endgame was conceived as an action movie and not a 3D feast for the eyes first. Despite that, care was absolutely taken with the 3D; if anything it just means that certain scenes didn't lend themselves as much as other scenes to a 3D narrative. A scene with Hawkeye chasing bad guys really too vague to be a spoiler who break through glass windows may stand out in 3D while a few seconds later a showdown with the same character has much less noticeable 3D value.

This seems like it has more to do with a lack of planning specifically for 3D than a lack of effort. So, I'd say very good here, but not great. Again, while I could argue not every scene in Avengers: Endgame has great "Before the Window" value, aka, the ability for objects to come off the screen, the stuff that works really works. In particular, anytime there's a heavily reliant CGI scene -- like the space scene teased in the trailer -- the 3D also pops. In particular, there's also a scene where Tony Stark is working in his home and the camera is at an angle from above on a stairwell.

There's a pole that jumps out onscreen that gives real spacial dimension. Small details like that stand out without ever feeling goofy.

But when you get to the front of the line, which big-screen experience do you want? With the most massive movie of them all hitting theaters this week, the question on many a moviegover's mind will be, is Infinity War in 3D and IMAX worth it? Or should they save their cash for more snacks? Today, most big-budget action films offer 2D and 3D options simultaneously, causing film fans a headache trying to suss out which is the "best" way to spend their cash.

There's a few easy metrics to look for that will help determine whether a film's worth the extra dimension: Was it shot in 3D? Was it shot in HD High Definition? Was it shot with 3D in mind? The first question's pretty self-explanatory. If a film was shot using a 3D camera, one that takes in two separately-spaced frames simultaneously, then you should probably see it in 3D. It's the format the filmmaker intended, and the footage offers true perceived 3D through parallax the slight difference in object placement mimicking the same spacing of human eyes that allows us to see dimensionally.